On 5 March 2014 19:00, Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure, but I wasn't sure whether all error code paths in kmalloc() resulted in > an OOM message. For instance, the following code path results in an allocation > failure but doesn't seem to print an OOM message: > > kmalloc > __kmalloc > __do_kmalloc > slab_alloc > slab_should_failslab > should_failslab > should_fail > > A bit far-fetched possibly as it requires fault injection. I haven't found any > other such code path, but my understanding of that code is a bit limited.
In that case should we actually accept patches like this at all? As they might be ending up removing some useful print messages? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pwm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
