On 04/09/2014 12:21 PM, Axel Lin wrote:
> Current twl6030_pwm_disable() implementation writes TWL6030_TOGGLE3_REG twice,
> the second write sets TWL6030_PWMXEN bits so the PWM clock does not disable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <[email protected]>
> ---
> Hi Peter,
> I don't have this h/w handy to test.
> I'd appreciate if you can review and test this patch.

You are right. The code was disabling the given PWM and then set the EN bit to
one :o
I don't have any explanation why it was like that, thanks for finding it!

Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <[email protected]>

> 
> Regards,
> Axel
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-twl.c | 8 --------
>  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-twl.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-twl.c
> index b99a50e..04f7672 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-twl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-twl.c
> @@ -265,14 +265,6 @@ static void twl6030_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, 
> struct pwm_device *pwm)
>  
>       ret = twl_i2c_write_u8(TWL6030_MODULE_ID1, val, TWL6030_TOGGLE3_REG);
>       if (ret < 0) {
> -             dev_err(chip->dev, "%s: Failed to read TOGGLE3\n", pwm->label);
> -             goto out;
> -     }
> -
> -     val |= TWL6030_PWM_TOGGLE(pwm->hwpwm, TWL6030_PWMXS | TWL6030_PWMXEN);
> -
> -     ret = twl_i2c_write_u8(TWL6030_MODULE_ID1, val, TWL6030_TOGGLE3_REG);
> -     if (ret < 0) {
>               dev_err(chip->dev, "%s: Failed to disable PWM\n", pwm->label);
>               goto out;
>       }
> 


-- 
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pwm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to