On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 10:41 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 05:22:59PM +0200, Jan Moskyto Matejka wrote:
> > Fixing this warning:
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c: In function ‘pwm_lpss_probe_pci’:
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c:192:2: warning: passing argument 3 of
> > ‘pwm_lpss_probe’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type
> > [enabled by default]
> > lpwm = pwm_lpss_probe(&pdev->dev, &pdev->resource[0], info);
> > ^
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c:130:30: note: expected ‘struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo *’
> > but argument is of type ‘const struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo *’
> > static struct pwm_lpss_chip *pwm_lpss_probe(struct device *dev,
> >
> > That warning was introduced in commit
> > 093e00bb3f82f3c67e2d1682e316fc012bcd0d92
> > ("pwm: lpss: Add support for PCI devices").
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Moskyto Matejka <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> This was reported over a week ago by the kbuild test robot and I've had
> fixes for this (and an additional sparse warning) in my tree for a while
> now. Interestingly everybody at Intel seems to have forgotten about this
> driver after their patches got merged since nobody cared to respond.
No - like everyone else we're all juggling multiple things. Also
remember there have just been a bunch of public holidays on large parts
of the planet.
I did see Jan's email but I didn't realise it needed a response, it was
clearly and obviously correct.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pwm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
