On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 04:49:52PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Now, I do agree that the terminology is a little confusing here. If you > look at the GPIO API there are gpio_*_cansleep() accessors, which in > their case, convey the correct meaning: the operation can/might sleep.
Perhaps I'm misreading, but that actually sounds exactly the same as the pwm_can_sleep() API. It sounds OK from a consumer/API perspective, but I was just commenting on the perspective of the driver writer. Maybe it's not worth much change, then, if several subsystems have similar naming. Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pwm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
