On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 22:37 +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote: > You don't get my point. I'm not talking about normal operation, but > about the case when the filesystem becomes corrupt, and fsck has to glue > together the pieces. Consider reiserfs:
See my other on list mail about the fallacy of the idea that consistency
of garbage data blocks is any better than inconsistency. As I mentioned
in it, even if it's a deleted file, a lost metadata block, etc., it will
always be consistent if it's a valid block to consider during rebuild
because *at some point in time* since the filesystem was created, it
will have been written. Reiserfsck is just as susceptible to random
garbage on a single disk not part of any raid array as it is to
inconsistent blocks in a raid1 as it is to a fully synced raid1 array
with garbage that looks like a reiserfs. That's a shortcoming of that
filesystem and there is no one to blame but Hans Reiser for that.
--
Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG KeyID: CFBFF194
http://people.redhat.com/dledford
Infiniband specific RPMs available at
http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
