----- Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------
    Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:58:49 -0800
    From: Dennison Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Dennison Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Subject: The effects of multiple layers of block drivers
      To: [email protected]


Hello,

I am starting to dig into the Block subsystem to try and uncover the
reason for some data I lost recently.  My situation is that I have
multiple block drivers on top of each other and am wondering how the
effectss of a raid 5 rebuild would affect the block devices above it.

The layers are raid 5 -> lvm -> cryptoloop.  It seems that after the
raid 5 device was rebuilt by adding in a new disk, that the cryptoloop
doesn't have a valid ext3 partition on it.

As a raid device re-builds is there ant rearranging of sectors or
corresponding blocks that would effect another block device on top of it?

Sincerely,
Dennison Williams

----- End message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----

If you add a disk and do a reshape the layer on top of the raid5 should only notice that the device is larger now. But yes, there is a rearranging of sectors going on. However this is transparent to layers on top. Did you have a disk failure during the reshape? If yes you probably have been bitten by the same bug as me: (http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=119910305111460&w=2).
Kind regards,

========================================================================
#    _  __          _ __     http://www.nagilum.org/ \n icq://69646724 #
#   / |/ /__ ____ _(_) /_ ____ _  [EMAIL PROTECTED] \n +491776461165 #
#  /    / _ `/ _ `/ / / // /  ' \  Amiga (68k/PPC): AOS/NetBSD/Linux   #
# /_/|_/\_,_/\_, /_/_/\_,_/_/_/_/   Mac (PPC): MacOS-X / NetBSD /Linux #
#           /___/     x86: FreeBSD/Linux/Solaris/Win2k  ARM9: EPOC EV6 #
========================================================================


----------------------------------------------------------------
cakebox.homeunix.net - all the machine one needs..

Attachment: pgpuSdM5nfzhH.pgp
Description: PGP Digital Signature

Reply via email to