And lo, Eyal Lebedinsky saith unto me:
>
> Jon Lewis wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 26 Dec 1998, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> >
> > > I think the FAST-5 was negotiated as the best the drive will do. Here is
> > > how another disk comes up:
In your kernel configuration, be sure that you've specified something
higher than the default (5) for the maximum synchronous connection speed.
I'm no Gerard Roudier, but I expect it might actually believe that
compile-time ceiling. Or it might not.
> ncr53c810-1-<1,*>: asynchronous.
> ncr53c810-1-<1,*>: FAST-5 SCSI 4.0 MB/s (250 ns, offset 8)
> I really think the disks are just stubborn.
This is another (unfortunate) possibility. It's been a while since those
ProDrives were made...
Keith
--
"Well, look at that. The sun's | Linux: http://www.linuxhq.com |"Zooty,
coming up." -- John Sheridan, | KDE: http://www.kde.org | zoot
"Sleeping in Light", Babylon 5 | Keith: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | zoot!"
www.midwinter.com/lurk/lurker.html | http://www.enteract.com/~kwrohrer | --Rebo
