Hi, On Thu, 11 Feb 1999 17:08:48 -0500 (EST), Billy Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I'm new to raid discussion. Why would you expect a 60 minute fsck > everytime? Would the boot up not skip that if the shutdown was clean? > Journaling seems like a complicated solution to save the time of an > occassional fsck. Am I missing the obvious here? Raid is most often used on large, 24-hour systems where any downtime at all is too much. Such systems are not expected to be rebooted often: what is important is the recovery time after _unplanned_ reboots, such as power failures or crashes. For user-visible servers, long recovery times after these events are unacceptable. --Stephen
- benefits of journaling for soft RAID ? Benno Senoner
- Re: benefits of journaling for so... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: benefits of journaling fo... Dan Hollis
- Re: benefits of journaling fo... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: benefits of journaling fo... Benno Senoner
- Re: benefits of journaling fo... Billy Harvey
- Re: benefits of journaling fo... Matti Aarnio
- Re: benefits of journaling fo... Malcolm Beattie
- Re: benefits of journaling fo... Dr. Michael Weller
- Re: benefits of journaling fo... Benno Senoner
- Re: benefits of journaling fo... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: benefits of journaling fo... Richard Jones
- Re: benefits of journaling fo... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ? Malcolm Beattie
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ? Richard Jones
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ... Malcolm Beattie
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arr... Richard Jones
- Re: fsck performance on large RAI... Richard Jones
- Re: fsck performance on large... Richard Jones
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ? jakob