yes, but raid0 offers you no data protection. you have been lucky,
hardware controller, software, or otherwise. raid0 is dangerous for
important filesystems.

allan

"so don't tell us it can't be done, putting down what you don't know.
money isn't our god, integrity will free our souls" - Max Cavalera

On Sat, 17 Apr 1999, Dave Cinege wrote:

> "m. allan noah" wrote:
> > 
> > do not use raid0 for part of your fs. i ONLY use raid0 for news spools.
> > raid0 DOUBLES (at least) the chances of total fs loss. buy a bigger disk.
> 
> Hmm. I've run a 5 drive hardware RAID0 on my multi boot workstation for years
> now. I guess you mean this only in the context of Linux software RAID0??
> 
> -- 
> http://www.linkscape.net/       Linkscape Internet Services   732-541-4214
> http://www.linuxrouter.org/     Linux Router Project
> 
> "If you're going to be stupid, don't be half-ass stupid, be all the way
> stupid."
> 

Reply via email to