On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 11:04:37AM +0200, Francisco Jose Montilla wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 1999, m. allan noah wrote:
> 
> [...]
> > had to sync and the fs had to check. that took a while. the problem may
> > have been this is a dual proc (ppro 180) machine, and one of the cpu's
> > stopped working! mut the raid, and knfsd and ypserv running on this box
> > continued to work, it was so cool.

It was also a one in a fantazillion.

There is no way for Linux to magically transfer control from a CPU that no
longer works, to the healthy CPU.  Which one is the healthy, if the two
disagree ?  How do you get the most recently touched data from the halted
CPU, when the CPU is locked up and the data is in L1/L2 cache ?
It's a no-go.  You want Tandem for that job, but I don't think they run
Linux (yet)    :)

>       What!? That's waaay cool. We have a couple of dual PPro 200
> machines that have literally toasted about a half dozen CPU fans, until I
> get some heavy duty 12v 6cm fans, a couple leds, a buzzer and a relay and
> cook up a home brew fail-safe (at least horrible-alarm-safe) system. They
> use to run NiceTry (now they're Linux-converted), and the system
> freezed... 

My dual PPro-150 used to lock up every two months or so, because of cooler 
failures.  That stopped when I got two fans that are too large to fail.  :)
(Yes, size _does_ matter)

> Maybe that's what have happened to you? One CPU fan went dead? I can't
> figure out how one CPU can freeze and the other keep on with the job
> without locking the entire machine... or maybe this is one more wonder of
> Linux on the PC architecture? 

It's quite possible that the CPU locked up because of over-heating. CPUs does
that.

But I think I can safely say that the fact that the system appeared to be working
afterwards, is not a wonder of Linux.  It is luck on a scale not often seen.  If
that happened to me, I'd bet all my money on horse-races and hope I was riding a
wave...

>       Please clear this out as it could be a marvellous point for Linux
> advocacy :) 

Well, it definitely matches

 `` NT is stable,  eh, we wouldn't call it enterprise if it wasn't, right ?''
or
 `` *BSD is more stable than Linux, because..., eh, someone told me once I think ''

Nah... We'd better not    :)

Cheers,

................................................................
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  : And I see the elder races,         :
:.........................: putrid forms of man                :
:   Jakob Østergaard      : See him rise and claim the earth,  :
:        OZ9ABN           : his downfall is at hand.           :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:

Reply via email to