Hi

What about using the "old" mdutils? Is there only support for raidtools in kernel 
2.2.9?

Dietmar

>----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
>Absender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Betreff: Re: first try (RAID0)
>Empfänger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Kopie-Empfänger: Marc Duponcheel , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Datum: 15. Jun 1999 07:51
>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> You will get it up and running BUT you will cry when you have problems and
> are unable to recover. I had it running for a few days and then it just
> locks up.
> 
> Regards
> Andrew
> 
> On Mon, 14 Jun 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 14 Jun 1999, Andrew Cameron wrote:
> > 
> > > Software Raid does not work on the standard 2.2.9 Kernel
> > > I have not yet found patches to get it to run correctly.
> > 
> > Sure it does.
> > 
> > $ cat /proc/mdstat 
> > Personalities : [2 raid0]
> > read_ahead 128 sectors
> > md0 : active raid0 sdb1 sdc1 sdd1 sde1 sdf1 11084640 blocks 32k chunks
> > md1 : inactive
> > md2 : inactive
> > md3 : inactive
> > $ uname -r
> > 2.2.9
> > 
> > > > root@tecra-brew:~ $ [bash] cat /etc/raidtab 
> > > > raiddev                 /dev/md0
> > > >         raid-level      0
> > > > 
> > > >         persistent-superblock   0
> > > >         chunk-size              16
> > > >         nr-raid-disks           4
> > > >         nr-spare-disks          0
> > 
> > Just a guess...but try losing the persistent-superblock line.  Other than
> > that, it looks just like my raidtab.
> > 
> > ----don't waste your cpu, crack rc5...www.distributed.net team enzo---
> >  Jon Lewis *[EMAIL PROTECTED]*|  Spammers will be winnuked or 
> >  System Administrator        |  nestea'd...whatever it takes
> >  Atlantic Net                |  to get the job done.
> > _________http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key__________
> > 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Andrew Cameron
> Internet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Internet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 

Reply via email to