> On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Marc Mutz wrote: > > Why does anybody want to use swap-on-RAID with any RAID level > than 1? Wouldn't it be much faster if you used multiple swap > spaces? > Pretty simple. If your swap space becomes corrupted or you lose the disk it resides on, the kernel chokes. Doesn't matter if you have several swap partitions or not. If the data required is on the missing/bad swap partition your system crashes. If it resides on raid this cannot happen because of a single disk that fails (if raid works correctly). [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Swap on Raid ??? Joel Fowler
- Re: Swap on Raid ??? jakob
- Re: Swap on Raid ??? Ingo Molnar
- Re: Swap on Raid ??? Paul Jakma
- Re: Swap on Raid ??? Jarno Lähteenmäki
- Re: Swap on Raid ??? Marc Mutz
- Re: Swap on Raid ??? Paul Jakma
- Re: Swap on Raid ??? Paul Jakma
- Re: Swap on Raid ??? Michael
- Re: Swap on Raid ??? Osma Ahvenlampi
- Re: Swap on Raid ??? Paul Jakma
- RE: Swap on Raid ??? Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: Swap on Raid ??? Marc Mutz
- RE: Swap on Raid ??? Roeland M.J. Meyer
- RE: Swap on Raid ??? Paul Jakma
- Re: Swap on Raid ??? Osma Ahvenlampi
- Re: Swap on Raid ??? A James Lewis
- Re: Swap on Raid ??? MadHat
- Re: Swap on Raid ??? Marc Mutz