On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 08:22:22AM -0500, Mike Bilow wrote:

> > >From the CPU load on the raid-1 soft IDE test, I think seems likely that you
> > didn't have DMA enabled.  Could that be possible ?
> > 
> > It doesn't make sense to have 97% CPU load when reading with 4 MB/s unless
> > it's done with port I/O.
> 
> I am not sure I agreed with that.  Here is a test on a 166 MHz Pentium
> with a Triton PIIX IDE chipset:
> 
>           -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
>           -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- 
> Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
>        100  1835 98.2  6728 30.2  3301 34.1  1844 94.5  9390 41.8 173.3 5.7

    unfortunately i don't have any hard benchmark results with me at the
moment, but i got well over 20meg/sec with 4 x IBM Deskstar 20GB 7200RPM
drives.  (they're the DPTA ones or whatever - the ones with 2MB of cache). 
each was running off its own IDE channel, two of them on ATA/33 and two of
them on ATA/66.  (BP6+HPT366, if anybody cares.)

    also, try hdparm -c3 -X66 at the very least :).

    next time i put linux back on here, i'll do another test.

-- 
: Andre Pang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Purruna Pty Ltd - ph# 0411.882299 :
:    #ozone - http://www.vjolnir.org/ozone/ | trust in love to save   :

Reply via email to