On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> I found that increasing the read_latency to match write_latency fixes the
>> problems perfectly - thanks for the pointer!
>
>Ok good. Andrea, could we bump read latency in 2.2.17-pre?
Yes.
>> Increasing the read_latency and write_latency to 10,000,000 results in
>> similar throughput, but catastrophic seek performance:
>
>Odd...
I guess it was the tiotest "Seek" bug that I mentioned in the other email.
>to backup the values chosen. But the current defaults do impose performance
>problems, as they did in 2.4, so I think that up'ing read latency is
>a good idea.
Agreed.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
