* Roland Dreier <rdre...@cisco.com> wrote: > > But yeah, I currently don't see a very nice match to perf counters. > > OK. It would be nice to tie into something more general, but I think > I agree -- perf counters are missing the filtering and the "no lost > events" that ummunotify does have. And I'm not sure it's worth > messing up the perf counters design just to jam one more not totally > related thing in.
The filtering can be done and has been done - see Li Zefan's patchset that uses filter expressions to do per event in-kernel filtering. The OOM DoS is a bug in your patches i think, which perfcounters solves ;-) Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html