>Private data: >- AF_IB/PS_TCP - the kernel munges the private data to be compatible > with AF_INET/PS_TCP, but otherwise is the same. >- AF_IB/PS_IB - the kernel doesn't touch the private data.
I was thinking AF_IB/* - kernel doesn't touch the private data, as it lacks the necessary information. >What about the service_mask feature of IB CM? not sure - Is it needed in user space? >How are the IP source and dest IPs going to be picked in for PS_TCP >mode? > >I guess user space does that and passes it through to the kernel? It could pass the private data when calling rdma_connect. >I think it would be fine to EINVAL on AF_IB/PS_TCP listen(). I'm good with that, but want to give this some thought. >Oh I see, well, a 'bind' api into the IB CM should take care of that? I think so. - Sean -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
