On 17:01 Mon 31 Aug , Ira Weiny wrote: > > The discussion on the list has digressed from this patch. I still think this > patch is valid and adds a level of flexibility which is needed regardless of > what is decided about libibmad. Do you agree?
Not really. I still think that needed level of flexibility is available for us without adding new mandatory APIs. > Also, the last patch in the series ([PATCH 5/5] infiniband-diags/libibnetdisc: > remove members of the fabric struct which are used in the scan only) cleans up > some stuff from the external interface. If you really don't want to introduce > a context object, then I can regenerate that final patch without the context. Yes, since this patch is unrelated logically to a context stuff. It would be good to rebase it back and repost as independent change. Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
