On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <sas...@voltaire.com> wrote: > On 08:46 Thu 12 Nov , Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> > >> > Any particular reason why there's no reporting of these traps? >> >> AFAIK it's been this way for at least the last 5 or 6 years. > > Yes, this is what I found too tracking down git/svn history. > >> A practical consideration in changing this is that these traps are the >> ones for which babbling port was implemented since they do not obey >> the trap rate so there's a large downside to adding the reports for >> these. If that is to be done, then perhaps this should be done based >> on some option. > > I don't think that we need new option for this, instead we should care > that OpenSM is not overloaded by such trap floods.
We've cared for several years now (babbling port policy was introduced into the master on 7/6/09) but this issue still persists. Are you saying no reports for these traps until the trap rate is obeyed ? -- Hal > > Sasha > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
