Liran Liss wrote:
I second...
fair-enough, so now (A) everyone agrees that DCB is good for IBoE and
(B) mlx4 supports pfc, any reason not to push the pfc patches into the
kernel and have mlx4_en comply with the mainline dcbnl code?
The only way an end-node can cause congestion is if its internal buses don't
match the IB link's BW, but this is unrelated to (lack of) transport-level flow
control.
thanks for clarifying this
Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
