On 15:11 Wed 13 Jan , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > In my tests I found that '8' is more optimal number (the tool works > > faster and without drops) than '4' used in OpenSM. > > > > Of course it would be helpful to run this over bigger cluster than > > what I have to see that the results are consistent. > > This is exactly my concern. Not only cluster size but use cases > including concurrent diag discover and SM operation where SMPs are > heavily in use.
Was it investigated? What was a conclusions? > There already have been a number of reports of dropped SMPs on this > list with the current diags and this change will only make things > worse IMO. > > Also, the OpenSM default should be at least as large as the diags for this. I don't know where concurrent MADs are used in the current "diags", do you? This utility is not 'diags' at all. It is placed in ibsim/tests and I wrote it for test purpose. Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
