On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:29:02AM -0800, Ralph Campbell wrote:
>  ....

I haven't looked carefully at the whole patch, but this bit 
looks wrong:

> @@ -848,61 +823,112 @@ static void ipoib_neigh_cleanup(struct neighbour *n)
>       struct ipoib_neigh *neigh;
>       struct ipoib_dev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(n->dev);
>       unsigned long flags;
> -     struct ipoib_ah *ah = NULL;
> +
> +     spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
>  
>       neigh = *to_ipoib_neigh(n);
> -     if (neigh)
> -             priv = netdev_priv(neigh->dev);
> -     else
> +     if (neigh) {

Should this be "if (!neigh)" ?

> +             spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
>               return;
> +     }
> +     *to_ipoib_neigh(n) = NULL;
> +     neigh->neighbour = NULL;
> +

-- 
Arthur

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to