> If the table is placed in mlx4_core (as of today in upstream), then I > assume the mlx4_en and _ib aren't being probed by pci hot-plug > mechasnisms, correct? else if you put it in _en _ib et al files, then > one has to maintain two copies of the table, but maybe this would be > the correct approach? how this should work with multi-protcol mlx4 > devices and/or IBoE?
I think the current upstream location is correct. This matches the practice of eg iw_cxgb3 as well as cxgb3i, bnx2i etc. This does have the disadvantage that mlx4_en and mlx4_ib are not auto-loaded by PCI hotplug, but so it goes. -- Roland Dreier <rola...@cisco.com> || For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
