On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 13:08 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Following commit 1437ce3983bcbc0447a0dedcd644c14fe833d266 "ethtool:
>  > Change ethtool_op_set_flags to validate flags", ethtool_op_set_flags
>  > takes a third parameter and cannot be used directly as an
>  > implementation of ethtool_ops::set_flags.
> 
> I assume this commit is in one of Dave's trees and breaks nes and ipoib
> because it changed the ethtool_op_set_flags prototype?

Right.

>  > Dave, Roland, you'd better decide between yourselves should apply this.
> 
> Since this depends on a commit already in Dave's tree, Dave should
> probably take it into the same tree.  I guess there's no way to roll
> this into the original patch to avoid breaking bisects once this ends up
> upstream?

Unfortunately it's too late to do that.

> anyway,
> 
> Acked-by: Roland Dreier <rola...@cisco.com>
> 
>  > +static int nes_netdev_set_flags(struct net_device *netdev, u32 flags)
>  > +{
>  > +  return ethtool_op_set_flags(netdev, flags, ETH_FLAG_LRO);
>  > +}
>  > +
>  > +
>  >  static const struct ethtool_ops nes_ethtool_ops = {
> 
> Also would have been a bit nicer to avoid adding a double blank line
> here, although that's obviously a trivial issue.

This spacing is consistent with the surrounding code.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to