On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Eli Cohen <e...@dev.mellanox.co.il> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 06:36:43AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
>> I suspect I broke either the UD header packing or the build_mlx_header >> function when I "cleaned up" the patches. I see the same problem, I'll >> take a look today. > I think this will fix things up. The + operator has precedence over > the ? operator so we end up with packet_length equal IB_GRH_BYTES / 4 > which is wrong. Once you guys feel to have a fix I would be happy to give Roland's for-next bits some further basic kernel (e.g IB link up/down, IPoIB, running SM on a node with IBoE patches) testing and a bit of more advanced (e.g IB/iSER, IB/RDS [Andy]) testing to see that things are in place with L2 IB, I would recommend also the iWARP folks to do the same as the addr/rdma-cm modules were also modified. The merge window still has about 9 days, so we're okay with delaying the push in 1-2 days, thoughts people? Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
