This fix is a cosmetic one, but this is the corect way to define sizeof in
malloc.
Signed-off-by: Alex Netes <ale...@mellanox.com>
---
opensm/osm_ucast_lash.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opensm/osm_ucast_lash.c b/opensm/osm_ucast_lash.c
index 0bd1827..739eedd 100644
--- a/opensm/osm_ucast_lash.c
+++ b/opensm/osm_ucast_lash.c
@@ -710,13 +710,13 @@ static int init_lash_structures(lash_t * p_lash)
/* initialise
cdg_vertex_matrix[num_switches][num_switches][num_switches] */
p_lash->cdg_vertex_matrix =
- (cdg_vertex_t ****) malloc(vl_min * sizeof(cdg_vertex_t ****));
+ (cdg_vertex_t ****) malloc(vl_min * sizeof(cdg_vertex_t ***));
if (p_lash->cdg_vertex_matrix == NULL)
goto Exit_Mem_Error;
for (i = 0; i < vl_min; i++) {
p_lash->cdg_vertex_matrix[i] =
(cdg_vertex_t ***) malloc(num_switches *
- sizeof(cdg_vertex_t ***));
+ sizeof(cdg_vertex_t **));
if (p_lash->cdg_vertex_matrix[i] == NULL)
goto Exit_Mem_Error;
--
1.7.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
