> > mad_agent_priv->agent.mr = ib_get_dma_mr(port_priv->qp_info[qpn].qp- > >pd, > > IB_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE); > > > > in which case it may be safer to check for the NULL pointer. Can you > confirm if this was the spot? > > Yes it was that spot. I did think of that today after I sent the patch. > > Do you think it would be safer just to check for both pointers QP0 and 1 > (depending on the registration)?
Yes, it seems safer and easier to maintain if we just validated the pointer. - Sean -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
