On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 05:29 -0700, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On 3/9/2012 2:27 PM, Jim Foraker wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 05:00 -0800, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >> On 3/6/2012 5:18 PM, Jim Foraker wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Support for "m_key=" parameter, 
> >>
> >> Shouldn't mkey be on a per port basis rather than a single mkey for all
> >> ports ?
> >      In the long run, I agree.  However, adding this support brings the
> > diags up to speed with the "one mkey per subnet" model that OpenSM
> > currently (sort of) supports.  
> 
> OpenSM mkey support is not complete for even that model. IMO the diags
> should not just be in sync with the current OpenSM (a minimum bar for
> this support) but support the general requirement. In the end, I suspect
> there will be several mkey policies supported by OpenSM.
     I've got some tentative OpenSM patches which I'll hopefully be
ready to post once we've hashed out the tools side.  At the moment,
they're centered around the "one mkey to rule them all" model too, but
should make it easier to support other model(s).

> 
> > We should do better down the road, but I
> > don't think this patch gets in the way of that.
> 
> I wouldn't think the approach for a per port MKey would use a single
> MKey parameter and store it in the source port structure.
     I was referring specifically to this patch, and in particular the
visible change, adding a "m_key" option to the config file.
     Dumping the mkey in the source port structure is absolutely a hack.
The problem is that no real context is kept on the destination port in
the current API, which near as I can tell means supporting mkeys
(particularly multiple mkeys) cleanly requires either bumping the API
version, or falling back on the deprecated saving of global state in the
library.  This would need to be cleaned up, but we could bunch that
change with others as part of a future API rev.

> 
> -- Hal
> 
> >>> plus config file now installs user-read-only.
> >>
> >> This part is best as a separate patch.
> >      I agree.  I was worried that applying the config change without the
> > permissions change may open a potential vulnerability, but the answer
> > there is just to have the permissions change earlier in the tree than
> > the new parameter.
> > 
> >      Jim
> >>
> >> -- Hal
> >>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jim Foraker <forak...@llnl.gov>
> >>> ---
> >>>  Makefile.am         |    2 +-
> >>>  etc/ibdiag.conf     |    2 ++
> >>>  src/ibdiag_common.c |    2 ++
> >>>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
> >>> index 950f95b..ef59bd2 100644
> >>> --- a/Makefile.am
> >>> +++ b/Makefile.am
> >>> @@ -112,4 +112,4 @@ install-data-hook:
> >>>   fi
> >>>   $(top_srcdir)/config/install-sh -c -m 444 
> >>> $(top_srcdir)/scripts/IBswcountlimits.pm 
> >>> $(DESTDIR)/$(PERL_INSTALLDIR)/IBswcountlimits.pm
> >>>   $(top_srcdir)/config/install-sh -c -m 444 
> >>> $(top_srcdir)/etc/error_thresholds 
> >>> $(DESTDIR)/$(sysconfdir)/infiniband-diags
> >>> - $(top_srcdir)/config/install-sh -c -m 444 $(top_srcdir)/etc/ibdiag.conf 
> >>> $(DESTDIR)/$(sysconfdir)/infiniband-diags
> >>> + $(top_srcdir)/config/install-sh -c -m 400 $(top_srcdir)/etc/ibdiag.conf 
> >>> $(DESTDIR)/$(sysconfdir)/infiniband-diags
> >>> diff --git a/etc/ibdiag.conf b/etc/ibdiag.conf
> >>> index 77f3ce9..2a2334f 100644
> >>> --- a/etc/ibdiag.conf
> >>> +++ b/etc/ibdiag.conf
> >>> @@ -15,3 +15,5 @@
> >>>  # Default = true
> >>>  #MLX_EPI=false
> >>>  
> >>> +# define a default m_key
> >>> +#m_key=0x00
> >>> diff --git a/src/ibdiag_common.c b/src/ibdiag_common.c
> >>> index 0901231..2089847 100644
> >>> --- a/src/ibdiag_common.c
> >>> +++ b/src/ibdiag_common.c
> >>> @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ void read_ibdiag_config(const char *file)
> >>>                   } else {
> >>>                           ibd_ibnetdisc_flags &= ~IBND_CONFIG_MLX_EPI;
> >>>                   }
> >>> +         } else if (strncmp(name, "m_key", strlen("m_key")) == 0) {
> >>> +                 ibd_mkey = strtoull(val_str, 0, 0);
> >>>           }
> >>>   }
> >>>  
> >>
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to