> Just wonder, the Infiniband Annex for XRC uses the terms "XRC INI QP" > and "XRC TGT QP" and the kernel include file "include/rdma/ib_verbs.h" > also defines "IB_QPT_XRC_INI" and "IB_QPT_XRC_TGT" so why to use in > "include/infiniband/verbs.h" other names i.e. "IBV_QPT_XRC_SEND" and > "IBV_QPT_XRC_RECV"? > I agree that send and receive are more intuitive but I think that > consistency is more important.
A user space API should strive to be intuitive to use and save developers from having to read specs. So, I'll disagree here. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
