On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Tom Talpey <t...@talpey.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Wendy Cheng <s.wendy.ch...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>> So I did a quick read on sunrpc/xprtrdma source (based on OFA 1.5.4.1
>> tar ball) ... Here is a random thought (not related to the rb tree
>> comment).....
>>
>> The inflight packet count seems to be controlled by
>> xprt_rdma_slot_table_entries that is currently hard-coded as
>> RPCRDMA_DEF_SLOT_TABLE (32) (?).  I'm wondering whether it could help
>> with the bandwidth number if we pump it up, say 64 instead ? Not sure
>> whether FMR pool size needs to get adjusted accordingly though.
>
> 1)
>
> The client slot count is not hard-coded, it can easily be changed by
> writing a value to /proc and initiating a new mount. But I doubt that
> increasing the slot table will improve performance much, unless this is
> a small-random-read, and spindle-limited workload.

Hi Tom !

It was a shot in the dark :)  .. as our test bed has not been setup
yet .However, since I'll be working on (very) slow clients, increasing
this buffer is still interesting (to me). I don't see where it is
controlled by a /proc value (?) - but that is not a concern at this
moment as /proc entry is easy to add. More questions on the server
though (see below) ...

>
> 2)
>
> The observation appears to be that the bandwidth is server CPU limited.
> Increasing the load offered by the client probably won't move the needle,
> until that's addressed.
>

Could you give more hints on which part of the path is CPU limited ?
Is there a known Linux-based filesystem that is reasonbly tuned for
NFS-RDMA ? Any specific filesystem features would work well with
NFS-RDMA ? I'm wondering when disk+FS are added into the
configuration, how much advantages would NFS-RDMA get when compared
with a plain TCP/IP, say IPOIB on CM , transport ?

-- Wendy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to