On Jul 16, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Jason Gunthorpe <jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com> wrote:
> A source change is completely unvaoidable. Supporting the new MTU > values requires updated source. I don't really care one way or the other; I'll submit whatever patch people want. :-) But FWIW, I tend to believe the Doug/Jason position: - MTU really needs to be a plain integer (not an enum) - forcing application source change/adaptation is the safest way to move forward - doing it this way preserves ABI, so existing binaries are safe -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
