On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Or Gerlitz <or.gerl...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK, Roland, I see that you didn't pick this for 3.11, probably as you > consider this non-fix, well the patches makes the initiator to avoid > bounce buffer for IOs > 4K, which saves kernel memory and CPU - which > I think can be considered a fix for the system behaviour.
Seriously? Please, let's have some intellectual honesty -- there's no way that iSER series could possibly be suitable as post-merge window material. The whole point is that we want to be stabilizing things, not introducing new code, even if we believe it's an improvement. > If you still don't agree, let it be, tough life... but you're the > maintainer. So in that respect && taking into account 3.11-rc3 is > already here, can you the door (== for-next branch) be opened right > away (please) for 3.12 patches, specifically this series? its > impossible to let kernel work towards a merge window be done only in > the 1-2 weeks before the window open. E.g I'd like to know that the > iser series is safe and ready to go from your POV, and f not fix what > ever needs to be changed now and not in two months just a little > before 3.11 is out, fair-enough? Yes, the iSER stuff looks fine for the 3.12 merge window. - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
