On 8/14/2013 6:26 AM, Line Holen wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Line Holen <line.ho...@oracle.com>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/opensm/osm_port_info_rcv.c b/opensm/osm_port_info_rcv.c
> index 7dcd15e..961b376 100644
> --- a/opensm/osm_port_info_rcv.c
> +++ b/opensm/osm_port_info_rcv.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static void pi_rcv_process_endport(IN osm_sm_t * sm, IN
> osm_physp_t * p_physp,
> osm_madw_context_t context;
> ib_api_status_t status;
> ib_net64_t port_guid;
> - uint8_t rate, mtu;
> + uint8_t rate, mtu, mpb;
> unsigned data_vls;
> cl_qmap_t *p_sm_tbl;
> osm_remote_sm_t *p_sm;
> @@ -126,6 +126,14 @@ static void pi_rcv_process_endport(IN osm_sm_t * sm, IN
> osm_physp_t * p_physp,
> }
> }
>
> + /* Check M_Key vs M_Key protect, can we control the port ? */
> + mpb = ib_port_info_get_mpb(p_pi);
> + if (mpb > 0 && p_pi->m_key == 0) {
> + OSM_LOG(sm->p_log, OSM_LOG_INFO,
> + "Port 0x%" PRIx64 " has unknown M_Key, protection level
> %u\n",
> + cl_ntoh64(port_guid), mpb);
> + }
> +
It looks to me like the only case here is when protect bits is 1 for
gets; all others fail. Is it more than that ?
Also, would this spam the OpenSM log ?
-- Hal
> if (port_guid != sm->p_subn->sm_port_guid) {
> p_sm_tbl = &sm->p_subn->sm_guid_tbl;
> if (p_pi->capability_mask & IB_PORT_CAP_IS_SM) {
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
