On 10/9/2013 11:52 AM, Sebastian Riemer wrote: > On 09.10.2013 17:15, Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> What does service restart do in terms of OpenSM ? >> >> Note that the console parameter is _not_ changeable "on the fly" right >> now so if OpenSM is being SIGHUP'd by service restart then this is a >> current limitation (and is clearly not detected/protected against in the >> current code base). It sounds like that may be what is going on. > > Yes, it emits SIGHUP. Thanks for the information! The opensm is a > critical component. So IMHO it needs to be fixed in a way that it either > protects itself against such changes by ignoring them on the fly or it > needs to support these changes. > > The current situation is not really acceptable and the opensm stability > is crucial. So I'll think about fixing it. > Are you interested in patches in this regard?
Yes; such patches are always welcome! Thanks. -- Hal > > Cheers, > Sebastian > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
