>
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Weiny, Ira <ira.we...@intel.com> wrote:
> > I don't think this is a bad idea, however, the complication is determining
> > the
> kmem_cache object size in that case. How about we limit this value to < 2K
> until such time as there is a need for larger support?
>
> Can we just get rid of all the kmem_caches used in the MAD code? I don't
> think any of this is so performance-critical that we couldn't just use
> kmalloc...
>
On an SM node the MAD code is _very_ performance-critical. I don’t think we
should give that up.
Another alternative is to have a cache per device based on the size reported.
-- Ira
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{��ٚ�{ay� ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z� �w���
���j:+v���w�j�m��������zZ+�����ݢj"��!�i
