On 02/12/2015 09:47 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
So, I'll keep a new branch and this branch, and I'll reorder things (like the
singleton fix you brought
up in another email being first) and squash things, and when I get done,
I'll do a diff between the two branches to make sure that there are no
logical differences. That should avoid invalidating all of the
testing/QE work that has already been done on this patchset.
yes, lets do that, for example, patches 1-21 touch 56 times the
mcast_mutex and patch #22 removes that mutex all together, this is
nightmare for future bisection and maintenance. Please post the
revised/shorter series once you have it to the list and specify the
branch too.
In the meantime, Erez can work off of these patches knowing the end result will
be the same either way.
We are almost one week into the 3.20 merge window and our WW (Sun-Thu)
is pretty much done. Erez will try to give some post-WW feedback but
next week is on a well-pre-planned OOO -- I'm really not sure what
should we do here. If you have the squashed patches by the end of this
week, and our regression system runs them early next week maybe we can
ack them.
Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
