On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 16:48 +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: > Hi, > > Le mardi 19 mai 2015 à 11:36 -0400, Doug Ledford a écrit : > > On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 16:14 +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: > > > > > > Is Doug the maintainer of the userspace library ? > > > > Libibverbs and the kernel verbs interface are very closely tied, so I > > did ask Roland if he was OK with me taking over that as well. It > > would > > make it easier to keep the two in sync. Roland was fine with that. > > If > > anyone has any objections, please speak now. > > > > > OK, I think I've missed the memo :)
No, there wasn't a memo yet. But, Jeff's question followed by your
question was the perfect introduction to bring the issue up.
As I mentioned, I think there is a pretty strong tie between the kernel
stack the libibverbs. Especially when you consider that things like
verbs extensions need to be synced between the two. That's why I'm
offering/suggesting that it would be a good idea that I handle it along
with the kernel.
--
Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
