On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:46:36PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > > Remember, this isn't RDMA namespaces, this is netdev namespace support > > for RDMA-CM -> very different things. > > That was the point of my email. This is a very myopic view of the > feature. It *should* at least have an idea of these other things too.
Everything you talked about seems covered: iwarp/roce/ib now have a fairly clear uniform story for CM. usNIC doesn't use core code. I doubt a larger discussion about a 'rdma namespace' is going to substantially change these patches, they are really netdev focused. Anyhow, I've been saving that discussion for when the roce and umad/uverbs namespace stuff is re-sent. It seems more appropriate at that point. I don't know about you, but I am exhausted looking at these huge patch sets, and narrowing the focus is the only way I see to get through. This series has hopefully narrowed to: 'fix the flow in netdev handling for rdma-cm'. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
