On 27/07/2015 20:45, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 06:33:41PM +0300, Haggai Eran wrote: >> From: Yotam Kenneth <yota...@mellanox.com> >> >> In the case of IPoIB, and maybe in other cases, the network device is >> managed by an upper-layer protocol (ULP). In order to expose this >> network device to other users of the IB device, let ULPs implement >> a callback that returns network device according to connection parameters. >> >> The IB device and port, together with the P_Key and the GID should >> be enough to uniquely identify the ULP net device. However, in current >> kernels there can be multiple IPoIB interfaces created with the same GID. >> Furthermore, such configuration may be desireable to support ipvlan-like >> configurations for RDMA CM with IPoIB. To resolve the device in these >> cases the code will also take the IP address as an additional input. > > I already sent this, but again: > > Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com>
Thanks. I only removed it because the patch had some changes related to the locking scheme, and I wasn't sure you would approve them. Thanks anyway, Haggai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
