> On Sep 5, 2015, at 1:27 PM, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Series applied, thanks. > > Doug, a user-space related note, in LPC you made a comment that the > user space RoCE UD patches are broken with libnl3, well, talking to > Matan, he said this is indeed the case with the RHEL provided libnl3 > but not with the upstream nl3 -- I would not consider this RHEL > related issue to be a gating factor for picking the patches, thoughts?
It wasn’t going to be a gating factor anyway. The original patches went
through a review process already (that’s why libnl3 support was added in the
first place, a review comment). I’ve already applied those original, reviewed
patches. If it turned out that libnl3 in upstream support had been broken,
that would have been a fix patch.
—
Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com>
GPG Key ID: 0E572FDD
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
