On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:39:04PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 09:26:11PM +0000, Hefty, Sean wrote:
> > > +static int rvt_query_device(struct ib_device *ibdev,
> > > + struct ib_device_attr *props,
> > > + struct ib_udata *uhw)
> > > +{
> > > + /*
> > > + * Return rvt_dev_info.props contents
> > > + */
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > ENOSYS on all of the function templates. This and subsequent patches.
>
> We recently had a long discussion about what the correct answer here
> is.
>
> ENOSYS and EINVAL are both wrong for different reasons.. Can't recall
> if something else was settled on? I think I was suggesting one of the
> ENOTSUP varients?
You suggested EOPNOTSUPP [1]
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg30176.html
>
> Jason
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
