On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:40:48AM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 08:28:17AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 03:43:10PM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> >>+
> >>+/*
> >>+ * Things that are driver specific, module parameters in hfi1 and qib
> >>+ */
> >>+struct rvt_driver_params {
> >>+ int max_pds;
> >Can it be negative value?
> >>+};
>
> If so no protection domains would ever get allocated. I don't think anything
> else would break though if a driver were to do that.
In such way, it should be "unsigned int".
>
> -Denny
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
