On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 05:29:50PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Hrm.. sizeof(void *) > sizeof(dma_addr_t) seemed pretty obscure to me, > here is the original discussion: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/13/245 > > Sounds like someone was worried about sparc64. I doubt it is an actual > issue today, but granted the u64 did make some sense.
sparc64 still uses a 32-bit dma_addr_t. > > Now these drivers will end up dma mapping these virtual addresses later, > > so we might want figure out a) why the qib & co drivers even need the > > virtual address, and b) see if we maybe should always do the dma_map > > in the callers anyway, and just have an additional virtual address field > > for those drivers if absolutely needed. > > So, I *believe* the issue is that linux has (had?) no approved way to > convert from a device specific dma_addr_t to a virtual address. Linux doesn't have an approved way because it's impossible for the generic case. When you have an iommu you have potentially multiple page tables mapping physical addresses to device virtual addresses, and there is no easy way to do a reverse mapping. > It is really too bad we can't just use get_dma_ops to handle this case > and instead require our own infrastructure. FYI, I have a patch series in linux-next to switches all remaining architectures to use get_dma_ops, and there are plans to allow generic per-device dma_ops based on that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
