On 12/23/2015 04:31 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 07:49:59PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 10, 2015, at 6:30 PM, Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:07:03AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>> The ARM folks do this sort of stuff on a regular basis.. Very early on
>>>> Doug prepares a topic branch with only the big change, NFS folks pull
>>>> it and then pull your work. Then Doug would send the topic branch to
>>>> Linus as soon as the merge window opens, then NFS would send theirs.
>>>>
>>>> This is alot less work overall than trying to sequence multiple
>>>> patches over multiple releases..
>>>
>>> Agreed.  Staging has alaways been a giant pain and things tend to never
>>> finish moving over that way if they are non-trivial enough.
>>
>> In that case:
>>
>> You need to make sure you have all the right Acks. I've added
>> Anna and Bruce to Ack the NFS-related portions. Santosh should
>> Ack the RDS part.
>>
>> http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/rdma.git/shortlog/refs/heads/ib_device_attr
> 
> Fine by me.
> 
>> Given the proximity to the holidays and the next merge window,
>> Doug will need to get a properly-acked topic branch published
>> in the next day or two so the rest of us can rebase and start
>> testing before the relevant parties disappear for the holiday.
> 
> What branch should I be working from?

That patch was very intrusive (and I didn't like the change to the
structure organization).  An alternative patch was proposed and I took
it instead.  The patch I took is much less intrusive, but you might
still need to adjust things slightly.  I've pushed my current WIP
for-next branch to my github repo:

git://github.com/dledford/linux.git for-next

This branch might get rebased still yet before it gets pushed to my
official repo at k.o, but it is perfectly fine to check that your
patches will merge with my for-next branch without conflicts.


-- 
Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com>
              GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to