On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 07:21:09PM +0800, Zhen Ni wrote:
> pru_rproc_set_ctable() accessed rproc->priv before the IS_ERR_OR_NULL
> check, which could lead to a null pointer dereference. Move the pru
> assignment, ensuring we never dereference a NULL rproc pointer.
>
> Fixes: 102853400321 ("remoteproc: pru: Add pru_rproc_set_ctable() function")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Ni <[email protected]>
Applied.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> ---
> v2:
> - Changed "null" to "NULL"
> - Added " pru:" prefix
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c
> index 842e4b6cc5f9..5e3eb7b86a0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c
> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pru_rproc_put);
> */
> int pru_rproc_set_ctable(struct rproc *rproc, enum pru_ctable_idx c, u32
> addr)
> {
> - struct pru_rproc *pru = rproc->priv;
> + struct pru_rproc *pru;
> unsigned int reg;
> u32 mask, set;
> u16 idx;
> @@ -352,6 +352,7 @@ int pru_rproc_set_ctable(struct rproc *rproc, enum
> pru_ctable_idx c, u32 addr)
> if (!rproc->dev.parent || !is_pru_rproc(rproc->dev.parent))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + pru = rproc->priv;
> /* pointer is 16 bit and index is 8-bit so mask out the rest */
> idx_mask = (c >= PRU_C28) ? 0xFFFF : 0xFF;
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>