From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+rene...@sang-engineering.com>

This change will also make Coverity happy by avoiding a theoretical NULL
pointer dereference; yet another reason is to use the above helper function
to tighten the code and make it more readable.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+rene...@sang-engineering.com>
---

Compile tested only. I am on the road and can't test the multimedia drivers
because of no cables :( If someone could test it, that would be much
appreciated. Or I'll do it next week. The pattern worked for other drivers
I could actually test, though.

 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c
index ed6006bf6bd893..ac95509e80bb7c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int rcar_du_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        init_waitqueue_head(&rcdu->commit.wait);
 
        rcdu->dev = &pdev->dev;
-       rcdu->info = of_match_device(rcar_du_of_table, rcdu->dev)->data;
+       rcdu->info = of_device_get_match_data(rcdu->dev);
 
        ddev = drm_dev_alloc(&rcar_du_driver, &pdev->dev);
        if (!ddev)
-- 
2.7.0

Reply via email to