On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:06:22PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > > > That fixes it for me: > > > > > > > > Tested-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verk...@cisco.com> > > > > > > > > BTW, your patch is garbled and I had to manually make the change (not a > > > > big > > > > deal for a simple change like this). > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for testing. I just copy-pasted the patch, so this was somehow > > > expected :) > > > > > > @maintainers, how to proceed with this? Shall I send that patch again > > > directly > > > to the linux-sh list? > > > > > > David > > > > How to proceed with this patch? Anyone?
Sorry for not getting you a response sooner. I don't yet have the hardware to test this fix on (would like to find some), but it looks reasonable to me and like it doesn't risk introducing other regressions. Sato-san, do you have any thoughts or objections to the patch? Rich
