On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 06:41:36PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: [ ... ] > > No doubt about that. I had some ideas and thought it is easier to talk > over code. If you want to rebase it, too, I'd be happy to check what you > came up with to solve the problems. I might still argue that I prefer > the less-code approach, but it will be Guenter's / Wim's decision, of > course. > I have a large back-log of patches to review. Simple patches with less code will get preferential treating. The more complex, the higher the likelyhood that the patches get pushed to the end of the queue.
Giving a quick glance, I liked Wolfram's patches because they seemed to be simple and straightforward. I hope the next version won't add too much additional complexity. Guenter
