On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:35:21PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> >             i2c9 = "i2cexio1";
> >             i2c10 = "i2chdmi";
> >             i2c11 = "gpioi2c";
> > +           i2c12 = "i2cpwr";
> 
> To make it easier for users, we should maybe group them?
> 
> i2c8+9: additional gpio busses
> i2c10-13: i2cexioX

Should we also group gpioi2cX?


Reply via email to