Hi Niklas,
    thanks for review

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:39:46PM +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> Thanks for your patch.
>
> On 2017-06-19 19:04:42 +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > Support parsing digital input on configurable port id and reg
> > properties. Also make the function return -ENOENT when no subdevice is
> > found.
> > This change is needed to support parsing digital input on Gen3.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+rene...@jmondi.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c 
> > b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
> > index 175f138..ef61bcc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
> > @@ -511,7 +511,9 @@ static int rvin_digital_notify_bound(struct 
> > v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
> >     return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -static int rvin_digital_graph_parse(struct rvin_dev *vin)
> > +static int rvin_digital_graph_parse(struct rvin_dev *vin,
> > +                               unsigned int port,
> > +                               unsigned int reg)
> >  {
> >     struct device_node *ep, *np;
> >     int ret;
> > @@ -519,13 +521,9 @@ static int rvin_digital_graph_parse(struct rvin_dev 
> > *vin)
> >     vin->digital.asd.match.fwnode.fwnode = NULL;
> >     vin->digital.subdev = NULL;
> >
> > -   /*
> > -    * Port 0 id 0 is local digital input, try to get it.
> > -    * Not all instances can or will have this, that is OK
> > -    */
> > -   ep = of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(vin->dev->of_node, 0, 0);
> > +   ep = of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(vin->dev->of_node, port, reg);
>
> I don't think it's necessary to supply the port and reg from the caller.
> If the DT proposed in rcar_vin.txt is used.
>
> >     if (!ep)
> > -           return 0;
> > +           return -ENOENT;
>
> I'm not saying this is wrong, but why do you change this? I can't see a
> clear advantage in doing so. And if do it I think it should be done in a
> separate patch explaining why.

For both questions, as I parse entries in port@2 and
rvin_digital_notify_bound was intended to use port@0 by default I made
port and reg parameters. I use -ENOENT to distinguish the case where
no endpoint has been found

>
> >
> >     np = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(ep);
> >     if (!np) {
> > @@ -555,11 +553,15 @@ static int rvin_digital_graph_init(struct rvin_dev 
> > *vin)
> >     if (ret)
> >             return ret;
> >
> > -   ret = rvin_digital_graph_parse(vin);
> > -   if (ret)
> > +   /*
> > +    * Port 0 id 0 is local digital input, try to get it.
> > +    * Not all instances can or will have this, that is OK
> > +    */
> > +   ret = rvin_digital_graph_parse(vin, 0, 0);
> > +   if (ret && ret != -ENOENT)
> >             return ret;
> >
> > -   if (!vin->digital.asd.match.fwnode.fwnode) {
> > +   if (ret == -ENOENT) {
> >             vin_dbg(vin, "No digital subdevice found\n");
> >             return -ENODEV;
> >     }
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
>
> --
> Regards,
> Niklas Söderlund

Reply via email to