Hello!

On 1/13/2018 2:14 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

   Here's my (superficial) comments...

The internal LVDS encoders now have their own DT bindings. Before
switching the driver infrastructure to those new bindings, implement
backward-compatibility through live DT patching.

Patching is disabled and will be enabled along with support for the new
DT bindings in the DU driver.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+rene...@ideasonboard.com>
---
Changes since v1:

- Select OF_FLATTREE
- Compile LVDS DT bindings patch code when DRM_RCAR_LVDS is selected
- Update the SPDX headers to use GPL-2.0 instead of GPL-2.0-only
- Turn __dtb_rcar_du_of_lvds_(begin|end) from u8 to char
- Pass void begin and end pointers to rcar_du_of_get_overlay()
- Use of_get_parent() instead of accessing the parent pointer directly
- Find the LVDS endpoints nodes based on the LVDS node instead of the
   root of the overlay
- Update to the <soc>-lvds compatible string format
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig             |   2 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile            |   3 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_of.c        | 451 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_of.h        |  16 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_of_lvds.dts |  82 +++++
  5 files changed, 553 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_of.c
  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_of.h
  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_of_lvds.dts

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig
index 5d0b4b7119af..3f83352a7313 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ config DRM_RCAR_LVDS
        bool "R-Car DU LVDS Encoder Support"
        depends on DRM_RCAR_DU
        select DRM_PANEL
+       select OF_FLATTREE
+       select OF_OVERLAY
        help
          Enable support for the R-Car Display Unit embedded LVDS encoders.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile
index 0cf5c11030e8..8ed569a0f462 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile
@@ -5,10 +5,11 @@ rcar-du-drm-y := rcar_du_crtc.o \
                 rcar_du_group.o \
                 rcar_du_kms.o \
                 rcar_du_lvdscon.o \
+                rcar_du_of.o \
                 rcar_du_plane.o
rcar-du-drm-$(CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_LVDS) += rcar_du_lvdsenc.o
-
+rcar-du-drm-$(CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_LVDS)    += rcar_du_of_lvds.dtb.o
  rcar-du-drm-$(CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_VSP)    += rcar_du_vsp.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_DU) += rcar-du-drm.o
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_of.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_of.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2bf91201fc93
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_of.c
@@ -0,0 +1,451 @@
[...]
+static struct device_node __init *
+static int __init rcar_du_of_add_property(struct device_node *np,
+                                         const char *name, const void *value,
+                                         size_t length)
+{
+       struct property *prop;
+
+       prop = kzalloc(sizeof(*prop), GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!prop)
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       prop->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
+       prop->value = kmemdup(value, length, GFP_KERNEL);
+       prop->length = length;
+
+       if (!prop->name || !prop->value) {
+               kfree(prop->name);
+               kfree(prop->value);
+               kfree(prop);
+               return -ENOMEM;
+       }
+
+       of_property_set_flag(prop, OF_DYNAMIC);
+
+       prop->next = np->properties;
+       np->properties = prop;
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+/* Free properties allocated dynamically by rcar_du_of_add_property(). */
+static void __init rcar_du_of_free_properties(struct device_node *np)
+{
+       while (np->properties) {
+               struct property *prop = np->properties;
+
+               np->properties = prop->next;
+
+               if (OF_IS_DYNAMIC(prop)) {
+                       kfree(prop->name);
+                       kfree(prop->value);
+                       kfree(prop);

   Perhaps these kfree() worth factoring out?

+               }
+       }
+}
+
[...]
+extern char __dtb_rcar_du_of_lvds_begin[];
+extern char __dtb_rcar_du_of_lvds_end[];
+
+static void __init rcar_du_of_lvds_patch_one(struct device_node *du,
+                                            unsigned int port_id,
+                                            const struct resource *res,
+                                            const __be32 *reg,
+                                            const struct of_phandle_args 
*clkspec,
+                                            struct device_node *local,
+                                            struct device_node *remote)
+{
[...]
+       /* Apply the overlay, this will resolve phandles. */
+       ovcs_id = 0;
+       ret = of_overlay_apply(overlay.np, &ovcs_id);

   You don't use 'ret' afterwards...

+
+       /* We're done, free all allocated memory. */
+out_free_properties:
+       rcar_du_of_free_properties(lvds);
+       rcar_du_of_free_properties(du_port);
+       rcar_du_of_free_properties(du_port_fixup);
+out_free_names:
+       kfree(lvds->full_name);
+       kfree(du_port->full_name);
+       kfree(du_port_fixup->full_name);
+out_put_nodes:
+       of_node_put(lvds);
+       of_node_put(lvds_endpoints[0]);
+       of_node_put(lvds_endpoints[1]);
+       of_node_put(du_port);
+       of_node_put(du_port_fixup);
+
+       rcar_du_of_free_overlay(&overlay);
+}
+
+static void __init rcar_du_of_lvds_patch(const struct of_device_id *of_ids)
+{
+       const struct rcar_du_device_info *info;
+       const struct of_device_id *match;
+       struct device_node *du;
+       unsigned int i;
+       int ret;
+
+       /* Get the DU node and exit if not present or disabled. */
+       du = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, of_ids, &match);
+       if (!du || !of_device_is_available(du))
+               goto done;
+
+       info = match->data;
+
+       /* Patch every LVDS encoder. */
+       for (i = 0; i < info->num_lvds; ++i) {
+               struct of_phandle_args clkspec;
+               struct device_node *local, *remote;
+               struct resource res;
+               unsigned int port_id;
+               const __be32 *reg;
+               char name[7];
+               int index;
+
+               /*
+                * Retrieve the register specifier, the clock specifier and the
+                * local and remote endpoints of the LVDS link.
+                */
+               sprintf(name, "lvds.%u", i);
+               index = of_property_match_string(du, "reg-names", name);
+               if (index < 0)
+                       continue;
+
+               reg = of_get_address(du, index, NULL, NULL);
+               if (!reg)
+                       continue;
+
+               ret = of_address_to_resource(du, index, &res);
+               if (ret < 0)
+                       continue;
+
+               index = of_property_match_string(du, "clock-names", name);
+               if (index < 0)
+                       continue;
+
+               ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(du, "clocks", "#clock-cells",
+                                                index, &clkspec);
+               if (ret < 0)
+                       continue;
+
+               port_id = info->routes[RCAR_DU_OUTPUT_LVDS0 + i].port;
+
+               local = of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(du, port_id, 0);
+               if (!local) {
+                       of_node_put(clkspec.np);
+                       continue;
+               }
+
+               remote = of_graph_get_remote_endpoint(local);
+               if (!remote) {
+                       of_node_put(local);
+                       of_node_put(clkspec.np);
+                       continue;
+               }
+
+               /* Patch the LVDS encoder. */
+               rcar_du_of_lvds_patch_one(du, port_id, &res, reg, &clkspec,
+                                         local, remote);
+
+               of_node_put(clkspec.np);
+               of_node_put(remote);
+               of_node_put(local);

   Worth using labels here to avoid the dupication?

+       }
+
+done:
+       of_node_put(du);
+}
[...]


Reply via email to